Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

HOW FAR HAVE WE GOT ON WOMEN'S LIBERATION?

 |  Socialist Resistance no42  |  page 11-12

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

2007 is 37 years after the passage of the Equal Pay Act. While women working full time still earn 17 percent less than women working part time still earn 45 per cent less than men in the private SCOTOR

The situation for black women is also appalling - 44 percent less per hour than a white male.

2007 is 40 years after the major reform of abortion law in 1967, which at the time gave women in Britain some of the most extensive rights to control our fertility any where in the world.

Defending this against various attempts to restrict it through parliamentary amendment as well as fighting to extend the 1967 Act was a major mobilising focus for women and men in the labour movement in the 1970s and

The National Abortion campaign, at the centre of those key campaigns, ceased to exist in 2003. Abortion Rights, which emerged from the merger of NAC and the lobbying Abortion Law Reform Association, has not yet been tested in having to organise mass mobilisations to defend our rights

Childcare continues to act as a major barrier to women's full participation in social and political life.

The Day Care Trust in a report in November 2006 showed that:

• there is one place for every three children under 8, up from one place forevery nine children under 8 in 1997.

• use of childcare is rising for all groups, but is rising more slowly for under-represented groups such as lone parents, certain black and minority ethnic groups and low-income families.

• families of disabled children frequently report a lack of childcare in their area.

• parents in England continue to pay through the nose for childcare - meeting 75% of all costs in 2004/05. In coun tries with publicly-funded childcare, such as Denmark, parents pay as little as 30% of the costs.

After some bitter battles by feminists, the left did take on board the need to organise crèches to facilitate participation in conferences. Today, other than at events organised by trade unions, this is the exception rather than the rule

There are more resources available for women and children faced with violence than there were forty years agoand more women active in bourgeois politics. In the 1970s women MPs made up 4.3 per cent of the British parliament - today it is one in five.

The first conference of the women's liberation WHOVCment in Britain was held at Ruskin college, Oxford, in 1971. Over the next two decades, the self-organisation of women spread into areas that we didn't expect

Forms of organisation in many trade had existed for some time previously, but were reinvigorated by the new movement. But it was the organisation of Women against Pit Closures which saw women organised not as workers themselves but as a support for male workers that had the biggest impact on working class women.

The peace movement took on new life and militancy with the women's peace camp at Greenham Common opposition to Trident mark 1 - politicising a generation of activists as we need to see again in response to today's threat of Trident 2.

But like the rest of the workers' movement, the women's liberation movement was thrown onto the defensive by the rise of Thatcherism and has struggled to recover from the defeats that both the Tories and the growing strength of neo-liberalism in the labour movement inflicted.

But a new wave of feminism has been growing in strength over recent years, animated around blogs and particularly strong amongst younger women including many students. This new wave has often focused issues around violence and sexuality -but then these are issues where we probably made the least gains in the 1970s and 1980s. For second wave feminists like myself, it is a hugely positive development and gives us a new opportunity to consolidate some of our previous gains and win some new ones.

So it is welcome that two and a half years after the launch of Respect and after a number of rather acerbic internal debates around the right of self-organisation inside the organisation that

is organising women's conference to mark International Women's Day 2007.

While the conference is not women-only, the publicity says it is "aimed" at women. There is indeed a place for mixed conferences discussing questions of women's oppression. Topics which seem likely to of interest to feminists of all generations include Raunch culture and sexual exploitation*, Muslim women and politics, and "Is fat a feminist issue?"

This range of subjects certainly implies that the SWP intends to mobilise activists in the student movement to some extent.

Raising the question "should we defend a woman's right to choose" could be somewhat provocative depending on how it is posed (it's a bit unfortunate that less than a month before the conference no detailed agenda is available on the website).

After all Respect has a position of supporting abortion rights, passed after an acrimonious debate both on and off the conference floor at conference 2005.

And there is a real danger of stereotyping Muslim women by assuming that they might have a problem with the issue - or of letting men from their communities speak for them.

But if the idea is to strengthen all of our ability to coherently take up the arguments of the anti-abortionists, wherever they come from, then it's a positive development.

Overall, I for one am sorry I'm out of the country and so won't be able to make it. * (see the round table debate on Ariel Levy's book "Female Chauvinist Pigs" at www.thefword.org.uk)

Stop the War, Haifa Zengana, Sue Bond (PCS Trade

Union) and Victoria Brittain.

office on 0870 850 1978 to confirm your place.

Japan row over minister's jibe Japan's Health minister Hakuo Yanagisawa, has rightly caused a political scandal by he referring to women as "birth-giving machines" in a speech to local Liberal Democratic party members last month commenting on the country's low birth rate. He said "the number of women between the ages of 15 and 50 is fixed. The number of birth-giving machines and devices is fixed. All we can ask is for them to do their best per head." Yanagisawa subsequently made a half-hearted apology but said he did not intend to resign over the remarks. In this Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is apparently backing him - even though his own electoral support is plummeting. Since 1995 Japan has been recording one of the lowest rates of fertility in the world, and by 1995 the rate had fallen to 1.26 children per woman and the government has been telling women it is their "patriotic duty" to produce more offspring. Respect Women's Conference SATURDAY MARCH 3 2007

9.30 am - 5.00 pm WOMEN AND POLITICS TODAY South Camden Community School, near Kings

Cross, London Confirmed speakers include Lindsey German, Convenor of Registration £12/£10 unwaged - contact the Respect

page 12 of the scan

W