Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

Anyone for a nice portion of fried acrylamide?

Socialist Resistance no3  |  page 19

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

Last May, a big scare story hit the British media when it was con.

I firmed that fried, baked and roasted bread, potatoes and other starchy foods contained a chemical, acrylamide, that causes cancer and inheritable genetic changes in rats and mice. It is assumed to have similar effects in humans.

Can we eat our morning cornflakes and toast, or go to a takeaway for some fries, without getting poisoned?

The situation was deemed serious enough (for the multinational food conglomerates, in particular) for the World Health Organisation (WHO) to convene a committee on the matter.

This reported one month later that acrylamide was present, especially in crisps, chips, biscuits and breakfast cereals. recommended further research and that people shouldn't cook their food too much.

Environmentalists picked up the fact that polyacrylamide (made by joining lots of acrylamide molecules together) is used in .. Monsanto's herbicide, Roundup, to help it spread more evenly over crops.

Small amounts of acrylamide will be left in the polyacrylamide and more could be formed when it is heated. According to Zak Goldsmith, in November's Ecologist, the WHO is deliberately diverting attention They away from this source of acrylamide, and onto the cooking process - a "problem without a solution". This was a classic case of "putting corporations first".

The chemicals industry plays fast and loose with our safety, and agribusiness is particularly bad. We only have to look at the Bhopal disaster to see that. There

chemicals. often within a single company. So the argument about putting corporations first is simplistic. The second point is that the science refutes Goldsmith's claim that cooking starchy foods is not an issue. from Nestle) have shown that heating together purified (i.e. polyacrylamide-free) sugars and amino acids from potatoes produces large amounts of acrylamide. their emotions get in the way of the facts, which is harmful to the environmental are. should be more controls on the use of

But there are two problems with

Goldsmith's argument. Firstly, big corporations' interests are involved in both sides - food cultivation and processing, Two separate studies (one, ironically, Sometimes, fundamentalist ecologists let Environmental ROUND-UP PHIL WARD updates us on the latest hazards served up to us by capitalism Crops threatened by fungus