Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

Why market reforms are a rip off for all students

 |  Socialist Resistance no28  |  page 10-11

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

Department for Education The latest figures show over two million university students, with a further 198,000 studying for higher education courses in further education colleges. The increase in numbers of students has continued every year since 1987, when there were just over 800,000 HE students.

But the increase in student numbers has outstripped the expansion of academic staff, and funding per head of students has served to question the viability of courses covering some more "theoretical" and overtly "academic" subjects.

In preparation for the introduction of top-up fees next year, Anglia Polytechnic University announced plans to close three quarters of its courses (1,500) including chemistry and geography.

In several universities Italian and German language degrees are being dropped, while media student "consumer" buys the educational package that will guarantee a degree, which in turn will deliver enhanced earning power through which the loans and debts run up can be repaid - offers a potentially deceptive scenario to students. ¿A University should not actually "sell" a degree: instead it offers a course of education which enables students to study, and if they reach a sufficiently high standard they will get a degree.

Unlike transactions in which goods and services are purchased, and a failure to deliver the goods or services specified in the contract is in breach of the law, signing on for a degree and paying the fees cannot and must not be seen as an automatic entitlement to a qualification.

If this were to happen, the value of the end product would be drastically curtailed - and all students and graduates would lose out.

Nevertheless many new universities insist that the norm should be a 90% pass rate -irrespective of the abilities, skills and level of commitment of a given student cohort.

To make matters worse, larger classes offer less opportunity to address the needs of those students with greatest needs.

In Media courses the maximum teacher:student ratio has

been set at 1:25, with the obvious implication that while much

larger classes may be required

to run (there is no defined figure

above which a class of more

than 25 would have to split into

two, any undergraduate course

which does not recruit 25 students will not run.

However these numbers take

no account of the availability of

suitable equipment, technical

provision and support.

If for example 25 students are

successfully recruited to a journalism course, a teaching area

equipped with 25 computer terminals is needed.

Whatever government rhetoric

may claim, for HE students the

marketisation of education

means a dumbing down of standards, in which all students

stand to lose out.