Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

SUPER

Socialist Resistance no2  |  page 5-6

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

NURSES stances. Service Journal speculates that at least 100,000 staff - ten percent of the workforce - could actually wind up worse off as a result of the new packSome will face a lengthened working week (which will be standardised at 37 hours), others will be required to work new shift patterns and implement

The jury (and the calculators) are still out on the proposals as we go to press. Socialist Resistance will carry a detailed analysis of this and other NHS changes in our next issue. assistants to replace teachers in the classroom, initially to cover for absences and to allow teachers time off for marking and preparation.

The NAS / UWT and the ATL have signaled their willingness to allow teaching assistants to take classes in some circumThe NUT has so far correctly argued that this would undermine teachers' pay. There can be little doubt that the Government is using the issue of workload and teacher shortage to smuggle in its long-term plan of cheapening the teaching workforce and introducing Taylorist' methods - in which teachers would plan and prepare lessons, classroom assistants would deliver them

The losers in this would not just be teachers but classroom assistants - and thousands of children who would receive an even more reductive education.

page 6 of the scan

6 soclalst! ce Winter 2002