Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

London bus workers stage protest against low pay

Socialist Resistance no1  |  page 2

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

October 22 in protest against low pay. Up to 300 TGWU members from bus companies across the capital marched from the depots to the Greater London Assembly. They are demanding the same pay as tube drivers.

Bus drivers in London have lost out on millions of pounds of pay and pensions since privatisation. Shareholders are receiving big pay-outs while under investing in the transport system in the capital.

Drivers currently earn an average salary of £17,000, 45% less than Tube drivers who are paid an average of E31,000.

There is a chronic shortage of bus drivers in London, at present there are over 1,000 bus driver vacancies. This at a time when Ken Livingstone is calling for public transport

March organiser, Peter Kavanagh said: "Since the p late 1980s bus drivers' pay has fallen by El 20 a week compared to average earnings. The situation in London is worse with bus drivers now earning f230 a week less than the London average." He added there should be equal investment in the bus services as well as parity in pay and conditions. Spotlight

"In circumstances where unimpressive withess who no other coherent explana- appeared to give his evition suggests itself, the dence without regard for excessive form of punish- truth and solely with an eye ment, the absence of any to where the advantage lay. credible explanation for it and the numerous unsatis- .... factory features of the Respondents' (i.e. South West Trains) case, combine to point very clearly, in our view, to the Applicant's past trade union activities and the prospect of his engaging in such activities in the future as