Socialist Resistance

An archive of socialistresistance.org, 2002–2022

New Labour plans attacks Unions must fight to win respect for pensioners

 |  Socialist Resistance no21  |  page 5

This is scanned newsprint, not web text. The original PDFs carried no text layer at all, so every word here was read off the page by OCR. Expect dropped opening letters, run-together words and wrong characters. There was no contents page to cut the paper up by, so the articles were found from the size of their headlines: a headline may carry its kicker, and where an article ran beside a boxed panel a few lines of the neighbour can appear. The scanned issue is the authority; this text is here so the words can be found at all.

Like the National Health Service, state pensions are one of the cornerstones of the Welfare State.

New Labour is now trying to privatise pensions, to shift the burden from the present collective system to one that will depend on ability to pay.

The effects will hit low paid workers and the poor hardest.

The policy aims to prevent taxes from rising and to allow savings from pensions to flow into the money markets to boost share values, commissions and fees.

The fact that the private pensions "industry" unleashed by the Tories in the 1980's has been so corrupt that most people no longer trust it, is a huge obstacle to current plans.

Hence the almost complete failure of "opting out" and the more recent "stakeholder" pensions.

Alongside this, the cannibalisation of company pensions schemes by business means that even the schemes that avoid bankruptcy will have problems paying pensions to workers who have made life-long contributions.

New Labour's special contribution is to attack the public sector. They have recently proposed replacing the "final salary" scheme with a "lifetime average". The idea came from Ruth Kelly, the Blairite religious fanatic then at the Cabinet Office, now Education Secretary see facing page).

Her claim that a pension based on the average of lifetime earnings rather than on the final three years, will help lower paid civil servants (or those such as women who took time off to have children) is simply Blair-speak for cutbacks.

Another proposal is to make all public sector workers, including teachers, work until they are 65 or take a cut in pension.

This has provoked whreats of strong from www.uul.org.uk

FOR I FOR

UNISON, the NUT, the PCS

and other unions, with a plan

for a day of action and a mass

lobby of parliament in the

spring.

INDON T

OCIA JUSTICE

WON N ERAL